MEMPHIS, Tenn. — While Republicans talked publicly about gaining more control over their presidential debates, a panel of Republican National Committee members conferred in secret for months to create rules and penalties that would ensure 2016 candidates toed the line, according to interviews and internal emails reviewed by The Washington Times.
The penalties included stripping delegates from candidates who participated in unauthorized primary debates, a notion that created instant concern among RNC members who learned of the secret plans, the interviews and documents show.
RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has long wanted to break what he called the broadcast networks’ stranglehold over who gets to ask the questions at nationally televised GOP nomination debates: network reporters whom Republicans view as liberal, or questioners who are not as hostile to conservative philosophy.
What remained withheld from the 168-member RNC was the fact that some time ago Mr. Priebus quietly appointed a nine-member committee that included himself, and the panel began devising rules to govern the 2016 primary season.
That committee proposed that a candidate who participates in an early, unsanctioned debate be stripped of all delegates that candidate wins in primary contests held before Feb. 1, 2016. If a candidate joins an unsanctioned debate after March 1, the RNC would remove all the delegates that candidate wins in the seven days after the violation.
The details of the penalties proposed by the secret committee are listed in an April 24 email sent on behalf of RNC General Counsel John Ryder and in-house RNC Counsel John Phillippe. Other emails reviewed by The Times detail conversations leading to the formations of the plans.
“All, as a follow-up to this morning’s call, we would ask you to focus on and think some more about the delegate penalty rule. Any delegate that would otherwise be awarded to a candidate not eligible to receive such a delegate due to operation of this rule will not be allocated to any candidate. If any vacancy results, it shall be filled in accordance with the rules and procedures in place in for filling of vacancies in that state,” one such email states.
“Imposition of delegate penalties will be very tricky for a number of reasons, including the variety of methods used by states to allocate and to select delegates. If you think of any problems with the language above or of ways to improve it, please let us know,” another email states.